The Final Signs Before The World Ends..Sept…(2019)

•Published on Sep 23, 2019
273K subscribers
Matthew 24:3-14 3 Now as He sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to Him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be? And what will be the sign of Your coming, and of the end of the age?” 4 And Jesus answered and said to them: “Take heed that no one deceives you. 5 For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will deceive many. 6 And you will hear of wars and rumuors of wars. See that you are not troubled; for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
7 For nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. And there will be famines, pestilences,[b] and earthquakes in various places. 8 All these are the beginning of sorrows. 9 “Then they will deliver you up to tribulation and kill you, and you will be hated by all nations for My name’s sake. 10 And then many will be offended, will betray one another, and will hate one another.
11 Then many false prophets will rise up and deceive many. 12 And because lawlessness will abound, the love of many will grow cold. 13 But he who endures to the end shall be saved. 14 And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come.





Prophecy Update End Times News Headlines – 9/21/19

•Published on Sep 22, 2019
153K subscribers





Iran issues battlefield warning as US deploys troops In Saudi Arabia

•Published on Sep 23, 2019
113K subscribers




John 8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free
“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge” (Hosea 4:6)
1Cor. 12:3 Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of God calleth Jesus accursed: AND THAT NO MAN CAN SAY THAT JESUS IS THE LORD, BUT BY THE HOLY GHOST.
THE TRIBULATION OF THE UNJUST (Those who have rejected Jesus Christ as their Saviour) IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION CHAPTER’S 6 to 22:
Rev. 3:10 Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth:
Luke 12:37 Blessed are those servants, whom the lord when he cometh shall find watching: verily I say unto you, that he shall gird himself, and make them to sit down to meat, and will come forth and serve them
so won’t you accept Jesus now and be removed from that event and live forever with Jesus in the Family of God?
2 “(For he saith, I have heard thee in a time accepted, and in the day of salvation have I succoured thee: behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation.)” (2nd Corinthians 2:6)




QUESTION:    Please help me to understand something about the Millennial Kingdom. According to descriptions of the Kingdom in Isaiah and elsewhere, it will be ruled by Jesus Himself from Jerusalem. It will be characterized by peace, and “they will neither hurt nor destroy…”. How can that be if the people will be mortal and still have their sin nature to the degree that, when Satan is released 1,000 years later, the people will rebel again, bringing about a new Gog-Magog war? When do they begin to “hurt and destroy” again? What does omniscient/omnipotent Jesus do about it? This would seem to be a time when we, the Church, will be called out of the New Jerusalem to police the people (about which Scripture is silent).
ANSWER:    For years I wondered about the Millennium and its purpose. Finally I concluded that it’s the final chance to show whether humans, on their own, can live up to God’s standards. People have always offered three excuses for their failure to do this, so in the Millennium those excuses will be taken away. The first excuse is to blame the devil, so for the entire 1,000 years the devil will be chained in prison (Rev. 20:2). The second excuse is to blame the bad influence of unbelievers, so at the outset of the Millennium only believers will be allowed to occupy the Earth (Matt. 25:34). And the third is to blame the absence of the Lord, so all through the Millennium the Lord will be King of all the Earth, ruling in person (Zech. 14:9).
Even in this perfect environment natural humans will fail, progressively sinking once again to a level so low that when Satan is released he can immediately mount a huge army to try one more time to defeat the Lord.
The Church will never be called out to police the Earth because the goal is not to enforce order. The Lord would need no help in doing that. The goal is to demonstrate once and for all that there is no circumstance or condition where natural humans can live a life that’s pleasing to the Lord, even one as ideal as the Millennium starts out to be.

QUESTION:    Re: The Meaning of the Millennium. If the earth is re-populated only with believers after the 2nd Coming, and if believers can’t loose their salvation, then how can the 1000 years be a final test for mankind? In fact, what you are saying is that some will sink so low, they actually will loose their salvation and go to battle against The Lord. Would a believer do that – and can believers do that?
ANSWER:    Eternal security is a blessing only given to believers during the Church Age. Following the rapture, salvation will be conditional upon obedience and faithfulness (Rev. 14:12) just as it was in the Old Testament . Remember, Daniel’s 70th Week is a return to Old Covenant conditions. That’s why a temple and animal sacrifice are necessary. My study on The Nature of Post Church Salvation explains this.
Children born during the Millennium will have to choose to be saved and will have to remain faithful to stay that way. As is the case today, some will choose salvation and others will not. What’s different is that some of those who choose salvation will fall away. As the millennium proceeds the number of unbelievers will increase until there will be enough for a massive army to be waiting when Satan is released at its end (Rev. 20:7-8).



Tracking bible prophecy
Rapture Ready News
Main News Channels
End Times Headlines
Other Christian Sites







Rev. 6:6 And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine


2Chr. 7:13 If I shut up heaven that there be no rain, or if I command the locusts to devour the land, or if I send pestilence among my people;
2Chr. 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land


Matt. 24:9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name’s sake.
Matt. 24:10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another

·        Top Russian Politician Says Erdogan Told Him Turkey Will Leave NATO, Ally With Russia  
·        5 Horrifying Extraterrestrial Encounters Reported by Soldiers  




Matt. 24:6 And ye shall hear of WARS AND RUMOURS OF WARS: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
Matt. 24:7 FOR NATION SHALL RISE AGAINST NATION, AND KINGDOM AGAINST KINGDOM: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
Muslim Countries in the Middle East will launch an attack on Israel
PROPHECY OF ELAM – (Possible Attack on Iran’s Nuclear Program


Matt. 24:6 And ye shall hear of WARS AND RUMOURS OF WARS: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
Matt. 24:7 FOR NATION SHALL RISE AGAINST NATION, AND KINGDOM AGAINST KINGDOM: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
·        Top Russian Politician Says Erdogan Told Him Turkey Will Leave NATO, Ally With Russia  


Earlier, UK Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs Dominic Raab said that based on the information made available to him, the idea that Yemen’s Houthi militia could be responsible for last week’s attacks on Saudi oil facilities was “entirely implausible and lacking in credibility.” The Houthis maintain that their drones carried out the attacks.
The United States is attempting to involve Britain in a coalition to possibly initiate some form of military action against Iran, a source speaking to the Daily Star has claimed.
“The US is trying to build a coalition of support to take some form of action against Iran. The UK is the US’s closest ally so not surprisingly we have been asked for our view,” the source said.
Recalling the faulty intelligence during the buildup to the US-led coalition’s 2003 invasion of Iraq, which the UK ended up joining, the source said that “this time it looks as if they have the Iranians bang to rights,” with the US accumulating “a wealth of intelligence and it all points to Iran.”
The source did not reveal the specifics of this alleged intelligence information, but did indicate that “every time the West refuses to act against Iranian aggression the ayatollahs become even more bold [and] convinced the US will never attack them.”
London has yet to verify the veracity of the report, but did join the US-led maritime coalition formed earlier this year aimed at escorting commercial vessels in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz amid tensions with Iran. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates joined the maritime coalition last week, joining the US, the UK, Australia and Bahrain in the initiative. Other European countries declined to join.
On Friday, UK media reported that commandos from the UK’s Special Air Service special forces unit had been flown to the Royal Navy’s HMS Jufair naval base in Bahrain to guard the facility amid alleged intelligence warnings that ‘Iranian-allied saboteurs’ had picked the base and the UK Embassy in that country for potential attacks.
Iran did not comment on the story, but has repeatedly denied claims of its involvement in a string of recent attacks in the region, including the September 14 attacks on two Saudi Aramco facilities. Yemen’s Houthi militia claimed responsibility for those attacks, saying they used nearly a dozen kamikaze drones to carry out the strikes. The United States and Saudi Arabia have claimed that the attacks were launched from Iran.
The Houthi militia has repeatedly claimed responsibility for last weekend’s attacks on Saudi oil facilities, and warned again on Friday that Riyadh would face “more painful, deadly and destructive” attacks if the Saudi-led coalition’s ongoing “shelling, blockade and aggression” in Yemen did not stop. 
A Saudi-led coalition of nations began a military campaign in Yemen in March 2015 in an attempt to restore ousted Yemeni President Abdrabbuh Mansur Hadi to power. However, the offensive has been bogged down, and in recent years, the Houthis have launched dozens of missile and drone attacks against targets inside Saudi Arabia itself.


With the Middle East heating up to a fever pitch after President Trump just ordered additional troops and air defense systems to Saudi Arabia in the aftermath of last weekend’s drone attacks upon Saudi Arabian oil facilities that have jolted the global markets, this new story over at the website Al Manar TV reports what those pushing for war with Iran will never tell us: Iran will soon be holding joint military drills with Russia AND China in international waters north of the Indian Ocean, avoiding, for now, the ‘flashpoint’ in the Persian Gulf according to Iranian General Nezami Pour. 
With this recent story over at the Jerusalem Post reporting that both Saudi Arabian and Israeli fighter jets are being blamed for recently attacking pro-Iran militia on the Syria/Iraq border just some of the latest news of an uptick in fighting in the region of the world long known as ‘the world’s powder keg’, this new story over at Yahoo News reports that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards have just issued a warning to the world, and likely specifically America, Saudi Arabia and Israel: Any country that attacks Iran will become ‘the main battleground
And with Iran threatening that any country that attacks them will become ‘the main battleground’ hinting they won’t be afraid to take the war to whoever does attack them, that itself becomes more confirmation of this September 16th ANP story titled “Americans Better Lock And Load With War Against Iran Looking Inevitable And Iranian Sleeper Cells Allegedly Spread Across America, Just Waiting For The Word To Attack Us – The Global Armageddon Chess Pieces Are Being Moved Into Place.  
And with this push for war with Iran clearly being engineered by the ‘military industrical complex’ and the ‘deep state’ which thrives upon and makes billions of dollars off of war no matter how many Americans have to die, yes, the same ‘deep state’ that has been trying to take down President Trump’s presidency for 2+ years, the Iran-Russia-China military drills are more confirmation of remarks made by Russian president Vladimir Putin back in June, that any attacks upon Iran would lead to a global catastrophe. 
With the map at the top of this story showing roughly the 30+ biggest cities/metropolitan areas in America and this recent story over at the Daily Mail titled “How A War Between Russia And The US Would Kill 34 Million In Hours” reporting that the most populated 30+ cities in the US would be targeted with between 5 and 10 Russian nuclear warheads each should WW3 break out, their story contained a stunning simulation which we’ve embedded as the 1st video at the bottom of this story, showing just how quickly America would be obliterated by a carpet of atomic bombs that would eventually lead to the deaths of nearly 90 million people in only 90 minutes, with the dead spread across America, Russia and elsewhere around the world. 
Russia and the US/NATO targeting each others top cities in population and the major economic centers with between 5 to 10 warheads each, with said ‘carpet bombing’ leading to huge casualties in only minutes. 
And as we’ve reported previously on ANP, even those who survived such an annihilation will be facing absolutely unseen conditions, especially should the electrical grid across America be taken down as well as ‘Russian Insiders’ living here in America have warned would happen should war between Russia and the US break out as Club Orlov reported within this May of 2016 story.
And with the electrical grid down eventually leading to the meltdown of nearly every nuclear power plant across America, that ensuring a gigantic wave of deadly radiation would make its way across the entire nation as Dr. Peter Vincent Pry had reported in this December of 2018 ANP story, there will be no ‘winners’ in WW3. 
As former Ronald Reagan assistant secretary to the Treasury Paul Craig Roberts warned in a story back in September of 2016 when things were heating up between the US and Russia prior to the election, “5 or 6 Satan’s and the East Coast would disappear”, and it would only take minutes! From “A Russian Warning.: 
We now feel that it is our duty, as Russians living in the US, to warn the American people that they are being lied to, and to tell them the truth. And the truth is simply this: If there is going to be a war with Russia, then the United States will most certainly be destroyed, and most of us will end up dead. 
A long time ago Russia had to respond to provocations by fighting land battles on her own territory, then launching a counter-invasion; but this is no longer necessary. Russia’s new weapons make retaliation instant, undetectable, unstoppable and perfectly lethal. 
Thus, if tomorrow a war were to break out between the US and Russia, it is guaranteed that the US would be obliterated. At a minimum, there would no longer be an electric grid, no internet, no oil and gas pipelines, no interstate highway system, no air transportation or GPS-based navigation. Financial centers would lie in ruins. Government at every level would cease to function. US armed forces, stationed all around the globe, would no longer be resupplied. 
So should you hear anybody speaking of a war against Iran being a glorious thing and something that is necessary, we should remember that any such war will likely become World War 3 on US soil with Russia and China backing Iran and now Iran threatening any country that attacks it will become the ‘main battleground’. 


Ankara hosted a pro-Palestinian conference last week that featured radical Islamists who urged the obliteration of the Jewish state and advocated the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions campaign targeting Israel.
“Israel must be dissolved and destroyed,” said one speaker, according to a report in the German daily Die Welt.Speakers also urged boycotts, divestments and sanctions (BDS) against Israel at the event titled “Congress on the Future of Islamic World and Palestine.”
Kadir Arakas, the chairman of a Turkish-Shi’ite association, said “resistance in Palestine is important” during the “weakest period of Israel’s history.” Arakas urged that no Islamic country reach agreements with Israel or work toward closer relations with the Jewish state.
He did not define “resistance” but the meaning of the word for Iran’s mullah regime and its chief proxy, the Shi’ite movement Hezbollah, is violence against Israel. “If we want the liberation of al-Aqsa Mosque [in Jerusalem], we have to help the mujahedeen,” said Arakas.
The Islamic Republic of Iran’s Ayatollah Mohsen Araki also spoke at the event. At a conference of Islamic clerics in Beirut in 2015, Araki supposedly said that “annihilation of the Zionist regime is a sure thing and Quranic pledge.” The pro-Iranian Taghrib News Agency reported on Araki’s genocidal antisemitic remarks. Araki served as the personal representative for Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in London.
Araki is the secretary-general of the World Forum for Proximity of Islamic Schools of Thought. The Iranian regime’s state-controlled news agency AhlulBayt News Agency (ABNA) reported that the conference was “organized by the Saadat Islamic Unity Research Center in Turkey” and “brought together more than seventy foreign guests from 20 countries.”
ABNA, based in the holy city of Qom, focuses its coverage on Shi’ite communities across the globe.



Just after on Friday Pentagon leaders presented Trump with numerous “military options” for a response to Iran following last week’s twin attacks on Saudi Aramco facilities, Iran has again put the US on notice that any “limited attack” will assuredly lead to major war.
The briefing on “options” for responding to Iran were followed by a late Friday Pentagon announcement that it is deploying US troops to Saudi Arabia as a “first step” which could be followed by additional “kinetic” moves down the road. “As the President has made clear the United States does not seek conflict with Iran. That said we have many other military options available should they be necessary,” Defense Secretary Mark Esper said in the briefing.
Iran on Saturday responded to the move by again declaring any potential “limited” US attack on Iran would certainly lead to rapid escalation. The head of Iran’s elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Major General Hossein Salami, said in remarks broadcast on state TV that no such limited strikes would actually remain ‘limited’.
Gen. Salami said
“Be careful, a limited aggression will not remain limited. We will pursue any aggressor.”
Clearly understanding Trump’s deep reluctance to drag the United States into yet another costly Middle East quagmire, it appears the Iranians are telegraphing that if they can convince Washington that even a small, one-off strike on Iran could spark WW3, this could dissuade the US altogether from even limited, “kinetic” missions. 
It’s likely the administration could be spit-balling the idea of missile strikes similar to Trump’s two instances of bombing Syrian government facilities — each confined to a single night, not more than hours long, but going no further in terms of expanding the scope of originally defined objectives. 
It must also be remembered that over the past summer of ratcheting tanker wars, the IRGC’s Salami has repeatedly warned of capabilities to strike American bases and ships, including carriers, in the region
“Iran’s reach is no more confined to within its borders,” Gen Salami said months ago
“A guidance and control system capable of steering a ballistic missile to hit a mobile target is a miracle of technology which is possessed by maybe one or two countries (in the world),” he had explained at the time. 
But it remains to be seen that if a US first were to be initiated whether the Iranians would actually respond. There’s little doubt, however, that even such a “limited” US missile attack would put American troops and assets stationed in the region in harm’s way
Any potential Iranian response might even start on Saudi soil, where extra US troops are now being sent, according to the Pentagon plan.
Iran’s Guard Says Ready for ‘Any Scenario’ Amid US Standoff 
Iran’s powerful Revolutionary Guard is ready for combat and “any scenario,” its chief commander said Saturday, as the country’s nuclear deal with world powers collapses and the U.S. alleged Iran was behind a weekend attack on major oil sites in Saudi Arabia that shook global energy markets.
Iran has denied involvement in the Sept. 14 attack that was initially claimed by Yemen’s Iranian-backed Houthi rebels. Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, who is in New York for the U.N. meetings, has warned that any retaliatory strike on Iran by the U.S. or Saudi Arabia will result in “an all-out war.”
On Saturday, Gen. Hossein Salami, at a ceremony displaying pieces of an American drone Iran shot down in June, said that his forces have carried out “war exercises and are ready for any scenario.”
He added: “If anyone crosses our borders, we will hit them.”
Zarif claimed in a tweet that Saudi Arabia does not believe its own allegations that Iran was responsible for the attack on Saudi oil sites.
“It is clear that even the Saudis themselves don’t believe the fiction of Iranian involvement”, Zarif said, pointing to what he described as a Saudi retaliatory attack on Houthi forces in southwestern Yemen.
Saudi Arabia has been at war with the Houthi rebels since March 2015. The U.N., Gulf Arab nations and the U.S. accuse Iran of supplying arms to the Houthis, something Tehran denies.
Analysts say the missiles used in the Sept. 14 assault wouldn’t have enough range to reach the oil sites in eastern Saudi Arabia from impoverished Yemen. The missiles and drones used resembled Iranian-made weapons, although analysts say more study is needed to definitively link them to Iran.



Footage emerging late this week from an annual military exercise hosted by Russia and involving China, India, and Pakistan has drawn the attention of western military experts who say it’s definitely “upped the ante this year” given the number of foreign forces and the sheer size of the drills, and especially given it’s the first time Russia’s historic political and economic rival China has joined the games, amid a rapid warming of relations as both face intense Washington pressure.
Along with the only newly invited China, as well as Pakistani and Indian forces, other central and east Asian countries are participating, including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. What are called the ‘Tsentr exercises’ actually began all the way back in June but this week is considered the culmination of the most important “hot phase” drills focusing on “strategic command post exercise”
Russia, China, India, Pakistan & 4 Asia states field 128,000 troops, 20,000 vehicles and 600 aircraft for mock battle against terror state
— Murad Gazdiev (@MuradGazdiev) September 20, 2019
Involving 120,000 military personnel, about 600 aircraft, up to 15 ships and additional support vessels, as well as over 20,000 weapons and support equipment, the massive games are being primarily conducted within the central military district in Russia (hence the name “Tsentr-2019”), as described by the Russian defense ministry.
In early September Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu announced the multi-national games’ intent was not to focus on foreign enemies, but includes an “anti-terror” emphasis. 
However, a number of observers have pointed out the showcasing of Russian military strength sends an unmistakable message to Washington and its western allies.
Centre 2019: 8 nations, representing half the world’s population, battle simulated “terror caliphate” in huge military exercise. Southern Russia.
— Murad Gazdiev (@MuradGazdiev) September 20, 2019
US state-funded media wing RFERL described the games as a “Kremlin-led military exercises… under way that simulate a large-scale invasion of a rogue state.”
One analyst, Mathieu Boulegue, a research fellow of the Russia and Eurasia Programme at Chatham House, has been cited in reports as saying China’s involvement this year is huge and sends a firm, unprecedented message in terms of Moscow’s growing powerful military alliances
“The message is quite clear when it comes to Russia, it means that ‘we’re not alone, we have a lot of partners, we’re not isolated so whatever efforts the West are trying to do against us we are still able to have powerful military alliances with China, India and Pakistan’,” he said.



Iran was on its next move by the time the US announced on Sept. 21 the deployment of more troops and enhanced air and missile defense systems for Saudi Arabia and the UAE in response to the attack on Saudi oil facilities. 
As the USS Nitze destroyer deployed to the northern Red Sea opposite the Saudi coast, armed with Aegis combat systems for tracking and intercepting cruise missiles, Iraqi Shiite Population Mobilization Forces (PMU) swarmed up to Iraq’s borders with Saudi Arabia and Jordan, 
DEBKAfile’s exclusive military and intelligence sources reveal.
Washington’s cautious response to the attack on Saudi Arabia and US sanctions were met by Iranian aggression in full momentum and its heightened threat to Saudi Arabia and US allies. By posting its Iraqi proxy PMU forces on the two border regions, Tehran directly threatens the Saudi capital Riyadh from the north and Israel from the east. 
The Iraqi militia far outstrips Iraq’s national army in scale and armament, possessing new tanks, ground-to-ground missiles and an array of explosive UAVs. 
This is also Tehran’s countermove for the Saudi-Israeli air strikes on the IRGC Al Qods-PMU military compounds at Abu Kamal in eastern Syria and Al Qaim on the Iraqi side of the border. (See the previous DEBKA report).
According to our sources, the PMU’s double border takeover began on Sept 18 and was in place by Saturday. Sept. 21. The operation was set up by the Al Qods chief, Iran’s Middle East commander Gen. Qassem Soleimani, who spent part of last week in Baghdad in conference with PMU leaders. An officer called Col. Qassem Masliyah was appointed to lead Iran’s seizures of the two key borders. The operation was codenamed “The Will of Victory.”
The Iraqi militia used the Iraqi national army’s operations against ISIS remnants in western Iraq to camouflage its movements, at times even exploiting the Iraqi air force for its secret purpose. However, by Sunday, Sept. 22, The Will of Victory cat was out of the bag. Iraqi prime minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi ordered the army to recover the border regions from the PMU. This was largely an empty step, since the Iraqi army is no match for the powerful pro-Iranian militia and its commanders are unlikely to take on the challenge.



Ahead of recommendations to the president about about who should potentially lead the next government, former prime minister Ehud Barak, who ran unsuccessfully with the Democratic Camp party, on Sunday slammed likely coalition kingmaker Yisrael Beytenu chief Avigdor Liberman as “the opposite of a liberal” and accused him of playing the political field to obtain the premiership for himself. (Barak was in 10th slot on the Democratic Party list, and it won only five seats.)
Liberman’s secularist, largely Russian-speaking party won eight seats in the September 17 election, far fewer than Blue and White’s 33 or Likud’s 31. But neither of the larger parties has a clear path to a majority coalition, sparking speculation they will be forced into a unity coalition, and a frenetic round of jostling by smaller parties hoping to make the cut into the next government.
Liberman, for his part, premised his election campaign on the promise to “force” the two large parties to join in a “secular unity government” sans the ultra-Orthodox factions. Liberman also said during the campaign he would back the larger party, and not lean automatically toward his longtime coalition partner Likud. But following the election, he seemed to backtrack from supporting either party.
“There is no sign now that he is prepared to carry out his original commitment to recommend the larger party — nor his intention, which he announced [ahead of the election] to force Likud to replace Netanyahu,” Barak charged.
“Liberman’s stuttering over recommending Gantz should raise serious suspicions that he’s not really pushing for a broad unity government led by Gantz without Netanyahu. He seems to want both to fail, a failure that by law will enable any MK who can muster 61 supporters [in parliament] to demand a chance at forming a government.”
Barak continued: “His assessment seems to be that the fear of a third election [within a year] in early 2020 will drive the Knesset to choose the lesser evil: a government led by him.”
Barak warned against the “new excitement on the center-left” over Liberman’s demand for a secular government, which was “nothing more than a sweet summer fantasy, which will sour or evaporate by the fall. He’s no liberal, never was and never will be. The opposite.
“His only positive contribution could be to enable, through his recommendation of Gantz, the formation of a narrow and short-lived government without Likud. Such a government would lead immediately to the end of Netanyahu’s candidacy. That in turn would allow the government’s expansion [to include Likud], but led by Gantz and with Liberman as a member, not as its head.”
According to all-but-final election results, Liberman holds the key to forming the next government following a political deadlock between Likud and Blue and White



Diane Montagna
Pope Francis made a strong new push for globalism on Thursday, calling for a supranational, legally constituted body to enforce United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals and implement “climate change” policies.
Speaking to members of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences in the Vatican’s Apostolic Palace, the Pope said: “When a supranational common good is clearly identified, there is need for a special legally constituted authority capable of facilitating its implementation.”
“Think of the great contemporary challenges of climate change, new slavery and peace,” he told members of the Pontifical Academy, who are meeting this week at the Vatican for a plenary session themed: “Nation, State, Nation-State.”
Featured speakers at the May 1-3 plenary include German Cardinal Walter Kasper, who spoke on: “Peace Stemming from Justice. Theological Reflections Between Men, Communities and Nations”; Archbishop Roland Minnerath of Dijon, France, who delivered the opening talk on day two, themed: “Nation, State, Nation-State and the Doctrine of the Catholic Church”; and German climatologist and founding director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, who addressed the Pontifical Academy on “The State of the World.”
In his address to the academy, the Pope said that while “the principle of subsidiarity” requires that “individual nations must be given the power to operate as far as they can reach,” nonetheless “groups of neighboring nations — as is already the case — can strengthen their cooperation by attributing the exercise of certain functions and services to intergovernmental institutions that manage their common interests.”
The thrust of the Pope’s remarks, however, focused on growing trends toward nationalism which he said threatens migrants, the “universal common good” and the power of the United Nations and other transnational bodies to implement the Sustainable Development Goal agenda.
“The Church observes with concern the re-emergence, almost everywhere in the world, of aggressive currents towards foreigners, especially immigrants, as well as that growing nationalism which neglects the common good,” Pope Francis continued.
“There is a risk of compromising already established forms of international cooperation, undermining the aims of international organizations as a space for dialogue and meeting for all countries on a level of mutual respect, and hindering the achievement of the sustainable development goals unanimously approved by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 25 September 2015,” he told members of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences.
As Steven Mosher, Population Research Institute, explains:
Developing nations who adopt the SDGs will be pressured to legalize abortion, even though the word abortion never appears in the document. They will be told, falsely, that there is an “international consensus” that reproductive rights includes a right to abortion. They will be instructed that laws protecting the unborn violate this consensus and must be replaced with new laws permitting abortion on demand. And they will be threatened with the withholding of international aid unless they comply.
Pope Benedict XVI, affirming his predecessor John XIII, also called in Caritas et Veritate for a “true world political authority” to “manage the global economy,” “guarantee the protection of the environment,” “regulate migration,” and “bring about integral and timely disarmament” and work for the “common good.” 



[Check the date above before reading the article…]
A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.
Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ″eco- refugees,′ ′ threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the U.N. Environment Program, or UNEP.
He said governments have a 10-year window of opportunity to solve the greenhouse effect before it goes beyond human control.
As the warming melts polar icecaps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet, enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations, Brown told The Associated Press in an interview on Wednesday.
Coastal regions will be inundated; one-sixth of Bangladesh could be flooded, displacing a fourth of its 90 million people. A fifth of Egypt’s arable land in the Nile Delta would be flooded, cutting off its food supply, according to a joint UNEP and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study.
″Ecological refugees will become a major concern, and what’s worse is you may find that people can move to drier ground, but the soils and the natural resources may not support life. Africa doesn’t have to worry about land, but would you want to live in the Sahara?″ he said.
UNEP estimates it would cost the United States at least $100 billion to protect its east coast alone.
Excess carbon dioxide is pouring into the atmosphere because of humanity’s use of fossil fuels and burning of rain forests, the study says. The atmosphere is retaining more heat than it radiates, much like a greenhouse.
The most conservative scientific estimate that the Earth’s temperature will rise 1 to 7 degrees in the next 30 years, said Brown. 
The difference may seem slight, he said, but the planet is only 9 degrees warmer now than during the 8,000-year Ice Age that ended 10,000 years ago.
He said even the most conservative scientists ″already tell us there’s nothing we can do now to stop a … change″ of about 3 degrees.


“The interesting thing about the Green New Deal, is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all,” Chakrabarti said to Inslee’s climate director, Sam Ricketts.
“Do you guys think of it as a climate thing?” Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing,” Chakrabarti added. Source
Norway’s governmental incentive policy to force the populace to buy emission-free vehicles has recently been exposed as a “fraud” and a form of taking taxpayers’ money away from them in order to bribe them into proper behavior with it. This, much like California’s plastic straw banis a form of environmental technocracy driven by the irrational fears of trendy individuals with too much time on their hands and a position in power. The absurdity of making incremental bans and incentives to somehow lead to a grand scale change in the environment should not shock us as our political system does not provide any other option.
For most or possibly all of our lives (depending on our age) we have been fed the unflinching narrative that humans are bad, we consume too much, there are too many of us and we are destroying the planet.
In X number of years due to Global Warming or Climate Change or something else we are all going to die if we don’t change our bad behavior. This has been repeated so many times that it is now an unquestionable fact. If you ask most politicians in the West if they agree with this narrative they will passionately say “yes, we must save the environment” or something of the like while belching out platitudes to the audience. But what do they actually do to save it? They make tiny haphazard incremental changes.
If the Norwegian authorities were so sure that the internal combustion engine will be the death of us all, why did they choose to create an incentive based program (that has ultimately failed, as the incentives lead many Norwegians to buy two cars, one gas and one electric) to gently push the population towards buying electric vehicles for perks with things like free access to toll roads, free use of ferries, free parking etc.?
So there is a massive trendy push for environmentalism, but the system does not allow for the sweeping changes that some wants, this contradiction leads to what I refer to as the “Technocratic Approach”.
The Technocratic Approach is when lawmakers attempt to set up a system of carrots and sticks in order to force the population to change behavior towards a desired result.
If we go away from environmentalism we can see anti-alcohol legislation in Russia doing the same thing. Alcohol is forbidden from being purchased at night in most of Russia. This has partially lead to the decreasing alcohol consumption in the nation that nearly drank itself to death in the 90s. However, by what right can the government ban adults from drinking alcohol? Why is alcohol suddenly illegal at certain times of day? If alcohol is so awful why is it legal at all? The technocrat sees no need in addressing any of this logic, alcohol is bad, banning it at night reduces drinking, there for what is legal at 10:59 is illegal at 11:00.
This Technocratic Approach eliminates any form of reason or discussion, it is just simply done to harshly make change on a microscale be it alcohol, electric cars or plastic straws. It is scary to think about it but this nit-picky small-minded approach to making change in society is becoming the norm. 
A Technoc sees people simply as numbers or statistics that needs to be shifted by carrots and sticks and nothing more. 
Although the Technocratic Method does work (electric car sales did increase in Norway, there is slightly less plastic garbage in California, and Russians are drinking less every year) its attitude towards to population as mindless cattle is certainly felt and creates mountains of contempt. This is a mechanical spiritless way of thinking that does not work us humans.
The intellectually insulting Technocratic Approach is a key part of our Liberalism, which combined with its many other negatives makes one think that we need a new approach, and one that is far more human, one that gives a reason not to drink, or rallies us to buy a different type of car not under the whip of bureaucracy and fines but free will.



  • “We talked about the general situation of Palestinian refugees who have been living in Lebanon for the past 72 years. We told them that Palestinians in Lebanon are banned from working in 70 professions and have no right to own property. We gave them a list of 2,300 Palestinian refugees from Syria who want to go to Canada.” — Mu’awya Abu Hamideh, a representative of the Palestinian refugees who fled from Syria to Lebanon after 2011,, September 9, 2019
  • Human Rights Watch says that Palestinian refugees in Lebanon live in “appalling social and economic conditions” and are barred from employment in at least 25 professions, “including law, medicine, and engineering.”
  • “The Palestinian factions and others who benefit from our stay in Lebanon are denouncing us as traitors and of serving foreign agendas… but if anyone has another solution, he should bring it to the table. We are sure, however, that these voices are designed to prevent us from living in dignity.” — Mu’awya Abu Hamideh.
  • Instead of encouraging and assisting their people to move on with their lives and seek a better future for their children, Hamas and other Palestinian groups continue to lie to the refugees by promising them that one day they will go back to their villages and towns in Israel.
Are the Lebanese seeking to get rid of the Palestinians living in Lebanon? Many Palestinians seem to think that the Arab country they have been living in for decades has plans to throw them out.
Palestinian factions, meanwhile, are working in precisely the opposite direction, trying to stop the Palestinians from leaving their refugee camps. The factions want the refugees to continue living in misery and poverty so that they can continue to use them as pawns in the conflict with Israel.
They are hoping that the continued presence of refugee camps will keep the issue of the refugees at the center of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
In recent weeks, many Palestinians have been flocking the embassies of several Western countries in Lebanon asking to be granted asylum for humanitarian reasons.
In an unprecedented move, hundreds of Palestinians last month staged a sit-in strike outside the Canadian Embassy in Beirut. The protesters demanded that the Canadian authorities allow mass emigration of Palestinians to Canada.
The protest coincided with an online campaign launched by Palestinians in Lebanon to demand that Western countries grant them asylum for humanitarian reasons.
The Palestinians have been joined by some Lebanese citizens who say they, too, want to emigrate to Western countries.
Ahmed Fawwal, one of the organizers of the protest outside the Canadian Embassy, said that similar demonstrations will be held in the coming days in front of the Australian and German embassies in the Lebanese capital. The father of six, who works as a cab driver, said that young people were seeking to emigrate from Lebanon because they are being denied basic rights.
The would-be-immigrants have formed a committee called The Palestinian Youth Forum for Humanitarian Asylum to encourage and help those wishing to leave Lebanon.
Kamal Akel, one of the heads of the forum, said that Palestinians want to leave Lebanon, “which is depriving us of our civil, human and political rights.” The Palestinian leadership, he added, has abandoned its people in Lebanon and no longer cares about their plight.
Isam Udwan, head of the “Refugee Department” in Hamas, said he believes that Palestinians were receiving tempting offers to leave Lebanon for a better life in other countries. He claimed that some Arab states were cooperating with Israel and the US to pressure Palestinians to leave their homes in Lebanon. “The Lebanese government is also indirectly facilitating the emigration of Palestinians by permitting them to leave through its seaport,” Udwan claimed.
Instead of encouraging and assisting their people to move on with their lives and seek a better future for their children, Hamas and other Palestinian groups continue to lie to the refugees by promising them that one day they will go back to their villages and towns in Israel.



Submitted by Dave Hodges on Saturday, September 21, 2019 – 14:42. –
red dawn
In an earlier piece I wrote in the early AM, entitled, How the Alt Media Uses Insider Sources to Bring the Public “The Truth”, I wanted to educate the reader on some of the strategies that many of use in the alt media who communicate with insider sources and how we must take a qualitative research approach and combine aggregate data into a comprehensible and understandable story.
In the past several months, I have been working on what will prove to be some major stories. I will win no awards for the revelations that are coming. My reward is that I am in a position to warn my fellow Americans as to what is likely coming in the hope that they can make life-changing and sometimes, life-saving decisions. Today’s topic fits into this paradigm. If the reader desires to really understand, in a general way, how we in the alt media gain information that is not reported on the in the mainstream media, then please read the earlier piece I wrote today on some of these strategies.
Over the past six years, I have written extensively on the threat that lies in Central and South America, which is generally referred to as a Red Dawn invasion. This term is based on the 1984 movie, Red Dawn which depicted an invasion force which entered the United States through our southern border.
Yes Virginia, there really is a Red Dawn force that has been put together by three primary agents, namely, Russia, China and the United Nations.
In the past I have extensively detailed the military alliances formed by China and Russia in Central and South America and they are decidedly anti-American. A few years ago, CELAC (ie Latin America) held a meeting of the Americas and excluded Canada and the United States. In short, we are surrounded by enemies.
For years, both Steve Quayle and myself have been adamant on the point that when America is sufficiently weakened, we will be invaded Red Dawn style. However, unlike the 1984 movie by the same name, we will also be hit by embedded terrorist sleeper cells (eg ISIS, MS-13, the cartels) that are under the control of Russia, China and the UN. The average American has no idea what is coming. And as Steve Quayle has said on many occasions, what is coming is no longer coming, it is already here. Those words will ring true in the rest of this report.
Trump Is Dealing with the Red Dawn Threat by (Temporarily) Dismantling It At Its Core
President Trump, true to his book, The Art of the Deal, is very much proving to be the master of the deal. He is in the process of dismantling the core of the Red Dawn threat that looms large over the fate of all Americans.
There have been two recent events that speaks directly to his dismantling of the Red Dawn threat. As a disclaimer, my use of the term “dismantling” should not be confused with “eliminating”. The Red Dawn threat remains real, but it is under attack from the present administration.
If I were President for a day, I would make El Salvador a deal that they could not refuse. Why? Because, in the past, the Sanchez-Parades drug cartel (ie the Peruvian military banking/drug cartel) has set up terrorist based paramilitary training camps in El Salvador. The participants include Middle East terrorist groups and the cartels and they are being trained to invade the United States when the time is right. I have interviewed people, like Kathy Rubio, who have been to these camps. Oh by the way, the operation is also overseen by our treasonous CIA. If you think the CIA, at its core, serve the United States, you have not been paying attention. Yes, there are loyal Americans who work at the CIA, but they are not making the major decisions, the Deep State apparatus of the CIA is serving its own purpose and they are very much a New World Order organization operating at the executive level.
President Trump is attacking El Salvador by using the carrot rather than the stick. Pastor Sam Honnold, a recent guest on the CSS in which he disclosed unreported news from Central America, has sent me the following information which collaborates what I knew to be true. These revelations will be followed by a video of a press conference between a senior level official from El Salvador and the US government.
Salvadorean President Nayib Bukele came on board with the bigger plan yesterday in a shocking reversal of policy. El Salvador has long been the bad apple of Central America, openly allied with Chavismo (Venezuelan Communism) and hostile to the USA.  All that changed in one big day Friday, and El Salvador appears overwhelmingly behind their president in doing so (his approval rating is 93%)…
…Salvadorean President Nayib Bukele came on board with the bigger plan yesterday in a shocking reversal of policy. El Salvador has long been the bad apple of Central America, openly allied with Chavismo (Venezuelan Communism) and hostile to the USA.  All that changed in one big day Friday, and El Salvador appears overwhelmingly behind their president in doing so (his approval rating is 93%).  US DHS Secretary Kevin McAleenan (whose wife is Salvadorean) and Salvadorean Chancellor Alexandra Hill Tinoco signed the migration agreement and then took questions.  There is uncertainty as to specifics of the implementation but Hill Tinoco, speaking Spanish, stated the first priority is to take down the violent gangs.  Gang war has stifled the Salvadorean economy, terrorized the populace, and driven human trafficking/caravan formation.  Salvadorean gangs, or maras, are some of the most notorious and violent in the world, including the 18th Street Gang and famed rivals MS-13, often referenced (and vilified) by Donald Trump.  These gangs will be crushed immediately by US armed action and their extortion schemes terminated with extreme prejudice…  
President Bukele has only been on board for about 100 days and he has already broken ranks with the CIA-backed paramilitary forces training in El Salvador. Now, the good President needs to worry very much about assassination that would be planned by the CIA and carried out by either MS-13 or the 18th Street Gang, the known assassins for this group.
Chancellor Hill Tinoco signed another agreement of great import earlier yesterday with the Organization of American States.  This body of American nations, which has taken a turn toward convervatism under Secretary General Luis Almagro of Uruguay, will be overseeing the CICIES anticorruption oversight commission rather than the Globalist and Left-leaning United Nations.  CICIES, or the Commission International to Combat Corruption & Impunity in El Salvador, will oversee prosecution of corrupt public officials and organized crime, including Salvadorean and trans-national gangs.  A similar OAS delegation (including a US delegate) was turned away by authorities in neighboring Nicaragua on Sunday…it appears that dictator Daniel Ortega was not open to transparency into his government or investigation of his latest (highly suspect) election.  All of these nations agreed to such inquiry in the OAS Interamerican letter of 2001; they agreed that a rupture of democracy in any member nation is a threat to the stability of the region and will be investigated in this way. 
I’m certain that the faithful readers of the CSS will recall the recent videos of massive amounts of tanks being rolled out by the Russians in Nicaragua. Make no mistake about it, this was a Russian temper tantrum reaction to this breakthrough by the Trump administration in Central America. Trump is bucking the CIA and as the Kennedy family could accurately state, this is very dangerous territory for this President.
There is a second development that cannot go unnoticed, unless of course, one is a die-hard coincidence theorist. As reported in the Las Vegas Sun, the lights were turned out on five Central American countries including El Salvador, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and portions of Guatemala and Panama…a strange coincidence.  Paul Martin and I recently reported that the US military is preparing for an EMP attack and have taken countermeasures in communications and transportation. Trump has turned the tables on this threat and sent a clear message by taking down the grid of these 5 countries, that their infrastructure could be eliminated by the push of an EMP button. Why El Salvador? This, I am certain, was to ensure 100% cooperation with the dismantling of this force. In addition, did you catch the reference to the US forces taking down MS-13 in El Salvador? Any President of El Salvador lives in fear of this group and this is the carrot, along with economic aid that the President is offering. Trump is in the process of cutting off the legs of the Red Dawn force.
Also, a DEA source has told me that American submarines are interdicting Chinese shipments of Fentenyl into Central America for distribution to the United States which is an act of war by the Chinese government. Trump is slowly but surely reversing the tide of power directed at the US.
Don’t Jump for Joy, Just Yet
Trump’s motives are not coming from his desire to protect the American people, at least, not entirely. We have put additional troops in Saudi Arabia as reported in the MSM. I have two sources that said the original timetable for military action against Iran was to be in March-June. However, the timetable is being moved up to later this year. Trump cannot expend troops and material to the Middle East, maintain a war effort under threat of attack from Southern border which would be weakened by the fact that the majority of the troops will be in the Middle East. Therefore, Trump is making moves in the here and now to neutralize much of the threat from Central and South America. Russia’s massive tank display in Nicaragua was a clear emotionally-based message that Trump’s strategy will not work. But it is indeed working. Russia is going to forced to decide if they are going to fall on their sword over Iran. Subsequently, it is clear to this reporter, that Trump is protecting his military in the Middle East by attacking the Red Dawn forces, in the here and now. Will it work? The jury is out. And if Trump was merely serving the needs of the American people, he would be dealing with social media censorship ina  harsh manner which he is clearly not!
It is my personal belief that Trump’s actions will not entirely negate the Red Dawn threat. The effect of what Trump is doing is merely to slow it down so a war can be prosecuted with Iran and possibly Russia. 
What Is the Real Reason Behind War with Iran?
Near the end of WW II, the globalists of that day decided to make the US the superpower. They dubbed the dollar to be the world’s reserve currency. That meant that any country desiring to buy Middle East oil had to first purchase federal reserve notes and use the FRB’s to purchase oil.
About a decade ago, Putin rebelled against globalist banking interests and formed the BRICS (ie Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa). These nations would bypass the dollar and purchase oil from Iran in gold. The globalist bankers decided that over time they would conquer the Middle East and take away Iran as a source of oil to the BRICS. To Putin’s credit he saw this coming and began to sink his Russian hooks into Venezuelan oil. The US responded by destabilizing the country to the point where they cannot conduct any meaningful business. IF there is a WW III, this is what the core issue is about.
Do not be deceived by fake arguments of patriotism and don’t fall for false flag attacks like the recent one on Saudi oil. The globalists will have their war which will decide currency and oil production dominance. You, as Americans, will have to decide if you are going to let your sons die in the next war for banker profits.   


Recent Posts